Comparison of an operational and an axiomatic model of execution for multi-threaded programs Relaxed memory consistency models, in contrast to the intuitive sequential consistency model, allow the use of modern hardware and compiler optimizations. Thereby they non-trivially influence information flow security with respect to noninterference properties. To clarify this influence, a generic operational model of execution was developed by Mantel, Perner and Sauer that is tailored to applications in information flow security. In order to increase the confidence in this operational model, a machine-checked version of the definitions and a clear connection to the original specification of the memory models for which it is instantiated are desirable. Since other generic models of execution with other areas of application exist already, this connection can be achieved through an equivalence result between the new model of execution and another generic model for which the connection to the original specification of the memory models has been established already. The axiomatic model of execution by Alglave is suitable for this purpose since it is well-established and it has the desired properties with respect to the memory models. Since the information that is available in both models is not entirely equivalent, adaptations to the new model are required to enable an equivalence result. This talk presents an adapted operational model formalized in Isabelle/HOL and a proof outline for the fact that executions which are valid in the adapted operational model under the memory models Total Store Order (TSO) and Partial Store Order (PSO) are also valid in the axiomatic model. These contributions are results of the thesis "Comparison of an Operational and an Axiomatic Model of Execution for Multi-threaded Programs". Together with the other results of this thesis, namely a machine- checked hierarchy result with respect to the executions that are possible in the operational model of execution under four exemplary memory models and a machine-checked transparency result for the adaptations to the operational model of execution, this is the first step towards the desired equivalence result between the operational and the axiomatic model of execution.